Login    Register    Friday, November 21, 2008  
Critiques of Submitted Paintings Print  

 

      "Reach"
 by Tracey Costescu                               

Critique #1 by Elaine Wilk
First impression - the figure is centered and seems to be floating , painted in midtone and darks, hard edges in sepia.  The contrast is the shadow.  The rhythm and variation is good. 
 
The painting is disturbing to me.  If this is what the artist is striving for, it's working.
It leaves me trying to understand the shadows and form - which don't seem to be correct.
 
The brush work (or air-brush work) is very good.
Elaine Wilk, NWWS


Critique #2 by Joe MacKechnie, NWWS

Design/Composition:
A simple design with limited background information. Even though the figure is placed in the center of the page, it works because of the great gesture and angles throughout the body.  Since this is a photo-realistic monochromatic painting, the shadow on the wall and over the arm should be realistic too. That is, as the shadow moves down the wall, it should change direction when it meets the floor. Also, as the shadow moves across the arm, it should follow the contour of the arm and should also change value (lighter) as it moves across the surface of the arm.
 
Value/Contrast:
The artist displays a good understanding of values. The hand shadow across the rear arm could be a little lighter as it moves across the wrist. Also the shadow on the wall and floor should become darker (cast shadow) as it moves closer to the body.
 
Alteration/Variation/Rhythm:
Great gesture and movement. The head/hair seems to cause a little confusion to my eye. It doesn’t look right; perhaps showing a little of the face will help line it up with the angle of the spine and the right arm.
 
Edges/Shapes:
Since this is a photo-realistic painting, hard edges dominate in defining the outer edges of the figure. Within the figure, shadow shapes use soft edges to define the turning forms. Very nicely done. If there were more background shapes included in this painting, it would be nice to see some lost and found edges that tied the figure to the background shapes.
 
Color:
Monochromatic. A great way to learn and practice form, shadows and values without worrying about color. Very good control of values in this painting,
 
Other:
Very good job in creating a realistic figure. Excellent job in modeling the shadows within the figure to create a 3D look.

Joe MacKechnie, NWWS
 
  

"Mommy's Hat"
by Don Harvie

 Critique by Doreen Lundstedt
DESIGN/COMPOSITION:
My first impression of your image is one of a charming child in a special moment.  I am certain that this painting will have a long history as a family memento of this particular little girl and the 'mommie' symbol in the hat. 
In looking critically at the painting I see more connection to a still life than a figure...a large hat on a hat stand (child) and a collection of scattered small shapes on the dresser top.  I assume that a photo was the basis for the composition?  I would suggest further exploration on the little girl figure in the composition. I would also suggest this painting might be the first of a series. Do not change this painting!  I would like to see more of the little girl's form and action, less hat.  Perhaps a mirror in the background to reflect her image or a 3/4 view with a suggestion of her face, arm, hand. Her shoes are beautifully drawn and are the only suggestion of form.
VALUE / CONTRAST:
I would like to see more middle values.  The child /hat/ table top is nearly white. The dresser/ rug is very dark making the figure look like a cutout against the dark background.  The stockings are nicely integrated with the rug.  The lightest edge of the hat could be integrated with the white marble area to allow background/ foreground to merge.  
ALTERATION / VARIATION / RHYTHM:
The organic shapes in the hat, child, rug pattern contrast nicely with the geometric horizontals in the background.
EDGES / SHAPES:
 The outer edges of the painting are nearly the same in color and value except for the relief of the white dresser top.  The left edge might be lightened a little more leaving the right edge the darkest.  The shape of the skirt is a bit blocky to suggest the shape of the child within.  
COLOR: 
The hat becomes the point of interest as the brightest most forward color.  Nice repetition in the table top pieces and the skirt shadows.  The subtle color repeated in the rug pattern is wonderful.  
OTHER: 
Don has a fine ability in drawing as well as paint/brush handling as in the subtle color changes of the rug and form of the skirt.  The subject of the figure is the most difficult.  I might suggest Arne Westerman's book, "Paint Watercolors Filled With Life and Energy" for a look at his compositions and integration of background and  figure.  Please know this is only one person's impression of your painting.  If some of what I write seems negative I also see much skill in your ability.  
Sincerly, Doreen Lindstedt 
 


 

 Spiritual Chores

by Gayle Weisfield

Critique by Ken Duffin, NWWS

Spiritual Chores.jpg

First of all, it's a very nice piece.  The design and composition are quite good.  Colors are somber, but that may be the mood you wanted to convey.   

Drawing is my main concern.  The background is okay.  The perspective seems right.  The foreground main interest is vague.  I am not sure what is going on.  I think more definition in the drawing of the candles might help.  The figure needs to be better drawn, since it is the center of interest.  Perhaps a live model or scrap photo might be needed. 

It is very original and does make a statement. 

Ken Duffin, NWWS

Have Your Paintings Critiqued! Print  

 

New Program!                                                   New Service!

Would you be interested in having a NWWS Signature Member review one of your paintings and provide you with a written critique of its composition, rhythm, value plan, etcetera? A number of NWWS Signature Members have graciously volunteered to critique photos or digital images (on CDs or emailed) of paintings done by our members. All you have to do is fill out the form below, send it along with your photos and we will forward them to one or two Signature Member critiquers. This service will be provided free of charge, but limited to one painting per member for this first round. Future submittal rounds will be announced in the Hot Press newsletter and on the NWWS website. Because the ability of the Signature Member to offer a useful critique will be affected by the quality of the photo provided, it is important that the photo be a clear, accurate image of the painting. So that other members can learn from these critiques as well, we plan to publish some of the results in the Hot Press and/or on our website. These critiques are meant to help members improve their paintings. This is not a guarantee that you will be accepted into shows, but it should help you improve your work. If you do not want your name used in the newsletter or on the website, you may indicate your wish on the form.

Please Note:  At this time we request that the critique form and your image be mailed to NWWS Critique, P.O. Box 50387, Bellevue, WA 98015-0387.  The image can be printed out or saved on a CD in jpeg format OR you can email your image as an attachment plus the information contained in the form to Sheila Mattick at skmattick@gmail.com. Please resize your image to approximately 1024 x 768 pixels.

 In the near future you will be able to send the critique form and your image online.  We are working on this service.  Thank you for your patience. 

Click here to download critique form.

    Membership Benefits Officers and Committees Forums Newsletter Critiques Visual Library List Zip Code Index
Copyright 2007 by Northwest Watercolor Society    Privacy Statement